Pineapple, raw, traditional varieties vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pineapple, raw, traditional varieties
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pineapple, raw, traditional varieties | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 45 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Protein | 0.55 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Carbs | 11.82 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 43% more |
| Fat | 0.13 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 8.29 g | 6.48 g ★ | Pineapple, raw, traditional varieties has 28% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Iron | 0.25 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Vitamin C | 16.9 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
| Potassium | 125 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.