POPEYES, Coleslaw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
POPEYES, Coleslaw
0 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
11 wins
| Nutrient | POPEYES, Coleslaw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | POPEYES, Coleslaw has 79% more |
| Protein | 0.98 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 51% more |
| Carbs | 14.12 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Fat | 11.18 g | 0.15 g ★ | POPEYES, Coleslaw has 7353% more |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Sugar | 10.83 g | 6.48 g ★ | POPEYES, Coleslaw has 67% more |
| Sodium | 218 mg | 36 mg ★ | POPEYES, Coleslaw has 506% more |
| Calcium | 31 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Iron | 0.23 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Vitamin C | 14.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
| Potassium | 118 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.