POPEYES, Mild Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
POPEYES, Mild Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | POPEYES, Mild Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 271 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | POPEYES, Mild Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 has 201% more |
| Protein | 19.2 g ★ | 2.01 g | POPEYES, Mild Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 has 855% more |
| Carbs | 19.31 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 7% more |
| Fat | 13.01 g | 0.15 g ★ | POPEYES, Mild Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 has 8573% more |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 922 mg | 36 mg ★ | POPEYES, Mild Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 has 2461% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 0.91 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | POPEYES, Mild Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 has 32% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 269 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 43% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.