POPEYES, Spicy Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
POPEYES, Spicy Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | POPEYES, Spicy Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 253 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | POPEYES, Spicy Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 has 181% more |
| Protein | 19.61 g ★ | 2.01 g | POPEYES, Spicy Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 has 876% more |
| Carbs | 18.52 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 11% more |
| Fat | 11.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | POPEYES, Spicy Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 has 7367% more |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 997 mg | 36 mg ★ | POPEYES, Spicy Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 has 2669% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 1.01 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | POPEYES, Spicy Chicken Strips, analyzed 2006 has 46% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 289 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.