Pork, pickled pork hocks vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, pickled pork hocks
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, pickled pork hocks | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 171 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, pickled pork hocks has 90% more |
| Protein | 19.11 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, pickled pork hocks has 851% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 10.54 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, pickled pork hocks has 6927% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1050 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, pickled pork hocks has 2817% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Iron | 1.14 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, pickled pork hocks has 65% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 47 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.