Rhubarb, frozen, uncooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rhubarb, frozen, uncooked
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Rhubarb, frozen, uncooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 21 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Protein | 0.55 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Carbs | 5.1 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Fat | 0.11 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sugar | 1.1 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 194 mg ★ | 38 mg | Rhubarb, frozen, uncooked has 411% more |
| Iron | 0.29 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Vitamin C | 4.8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Potassium | 108 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.