Rhubarb, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rhubarb, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Rhubarb, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 21 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Carbs | 4.54 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Rhubarb, raw has 33% more |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sugar | 1.1 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 86 mg ★ | 38 mg | Rhubarb, raw has 126% more |
| Iron | 0.22 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Vitamin C | 8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
| Potassium | 288 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.