Rhubarb, wild, leaves (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rhubarb, wild, leaves (Alaska Native)
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Rhubarb, wild, leaves (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 61 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 49% more |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 5% more |
| Carbs | 9.9 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 54% more |
| Fat | 0.5 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 74% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 33 mg ★ | 0 mg | Rhubarb, wild, leaves (Alaska Native) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.