Rhubarb, wild, leaves (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rhubarb, wild, leaves (Alaska Native)
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Rhubarb, wild, leaves (Alaska Native) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 61 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Protein | 4.2 g ★ | 2.01 g | Rhubarb, wild, leaves (Alaska Native) has 109% more |
| Carbs | 9.9 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Rhubarb, wild, leaves (Alaska Native) has 233% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 33 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Rhubarb, wild, leaves (Alaska Native) has 68% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.