SILK Light Chocolate, soymilk vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
SILK Light Chocolate, soymilk
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | SILK Light Chocolate, soymilk | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 49 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
| Protein | 2.06 g ★ | 2.01 g | SILK Light Chocolate, soymilk has 2% more |
| Carbs | 9.05 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Fat | 0.62 g | 0.15 g ★ | SILK Light Chocolate, soymilk has 313% more |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Sugar | 7.82 g | 6.48 g ★ | SILK Light Chocolate, soymilk has 21% more |
| Sodium | 41 mg | 36 mg ★ | SILK Light Chocolate, soymilk has 14% more |
| Calcium | 123 mg ★ | 38 mg | SILK Light Chocolate, soymilk has 224% more |
| Iron | 0.59 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 144 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.