Steelhead trout, boiled, canned (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Steelhead trout, boiled, canned (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Steelhead trout, boiled, canned (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 159 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Steelhead trout, boiled, canned (Alaska Native) has 33% more |
| Protein | 21.11 g ★ | 4.4 g | Steelhead trout, boiled, canned (Alaska Native) has 380% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 8.26 g | 1.92 g ★ | Steelhead trout, boiled, canned (Alaska Native) has 330% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 118 mg | 7 mg ★ | Steelhead trout, boiled, canned (Alaska Native) has 1586% more |
| Calcium | 30 mg ★ | 17 mg | Steelhead trout, boiled, canned (Alaska Native) has 76% more |
| Iron | 0.64 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 57% more |
| Potassium | 365 mg ★ | 172 mg | Steelhead trout, boiled, canned (Alaska Native) has 112% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.