Steelhead trout, dried, flesh (Shoshone Bannock) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Steelhead trout, dried, flesh (Shoshone Bannock)
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Steelhead trout, dried, flesh (Shoshone Bannock) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 382 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Steelhead trout, dried, flesh (Shoshone Bannock) has 218% more |
| Protein | 77.27 g ★ | 4.4 g | Steelhead trout, dried, flesh (Shoshone Bannock) has 1656% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 8.06 g | 1.92 g ★ | Steelhead trout, dried, flesh (Shoshone Bannock) has 320% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2850 mg | 7 mg ★ | Steelhead trout, dried, flesh (Shoshone Bannock) has 40614% more |
| Calcium | 85 mg ★ | 17 mg | Steelhead trout, dried, flesh (Shoshone Bannock) has 400% more |
| Iron | 2.96 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Steelhead trout, dried, flesh (Shoshone Bannock) has 99% more |
| Potassium | 1720 mg ★ | 172 mg | Steelhead trout, dried, flesh (Shoshone Bannock) has 900% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.