Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 144 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 6% more |
| Protein | 19.78 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 20% more |
| Fat | 7.2 g | 5.28 g ★ | Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 36% more |
| Sodium | 95 mg | 90 mg ★ | Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 6% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg ★ | 8 mg | Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 100% more |
| Iron | 2.95 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 556% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.