Babyfood, fruit, applesauce, strained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, fruit, applesauce, strained
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, fruit, applesauce, strained | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 41 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Carbs | 10.8 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Babyfood, fruit, applesauce, strained has 33% more |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Sugar | 9.87 g | 6.48 g ★ | Babyfood, fruit, applesauce, strained has 52% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 0.22 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Vitamin C | 38.3 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Babyfood, fruit, applesauce, strained has 95% more |
| Potassium | 71 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.