Babyfood, fruit, apricot with tapioca, strained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, fruit, apricot with tapioca, strained
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, fruit, apricot with tapioca, strained | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 60 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Carbs | 16.3 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
| Fat | 0 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Sugar | 1.41 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Iron | 0.3 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
| Vitamin C | 21.6 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Babyfood, fruit, apricot with tapioca, strained has 10% more |
| Potassium | 121 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.