Babyfood, fruit, plums with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, fruit, plums with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, fruit, plums with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 41% more |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 98% more |
| Carbs | 19.7 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 8% more |
| Fat | 0 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 57% more |
| Sugar | 13.34 g | 0.87 g ★ | Babyfood, fruit, plums with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained has 1433% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Iron | 0.2 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 87% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.1 mg ★ | 0 mg | Babyfood, fruit, plums with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained has 0% more |
| Potassium | 85 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 51% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.