Babyfood, fruit, plums with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, fruit, plums with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, fruit, plums with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Carbs | 19.7 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 5% more |
| Fat | 0 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Sugar | 13.34 g | 6.48 g ★ | Babyfood, fruit, plums with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained has 106% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Iron | 0.2 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Potassium | 85 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.