Babyfood, fruit, prunes with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, fruit, prunes with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, fruit, prunes with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 69 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 43% more |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 86% more |
| Carbs | 18.5 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 13% more |
| Fat | 0.1 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 95% more |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 4% more |
| Sugar | 10.97 g | 0.87 g ★ | Babyfood, fruit, prunes with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained has 1161% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 12% more |
| Iron | 0.35 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 77% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.8 mg ★ | 0 mg | Babyfood, fruit, prunes with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained has 0% more |
| Potassium | 177 mg ★ | 172 mg | Babyfood, fruit, prunes with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained has 3% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.