Babyfood, fruit, prunes with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Babyfood, fruit, prunes with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Babyfood, fruit, prunes with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 69 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more
Protein 0.6 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more
Carbs 18.5 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 11% more
Fat 0.1 g 0.15 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more
Fiber 2.7 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more
Sugar 10.97 g 6.48 g Babyfood, fruit, prunes with tapioca, without ascorbic acid, strained has 69% more
Sodium 5 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more
Calcium 15 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more
Iron 0.35 mg 0.69 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more
Vitamin C 0.8 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more
Potassium 177 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.