Babyfood, plums, bananas and rice, strained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, plums, bananas and rice, strained
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, plums, bananas and rice, strained | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 57 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Carbs | 12.7 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Babyfood, plums, bananas and rice, strained has 100% more |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Sugar | 9.3 g | 6.48 g ★ | Babyfood, plums, bananas and rice, strained has 44% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 12.3 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
| Potassium | 265 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.