Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 48% more |
| Protein | 22.03 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 996% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.99 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 3227% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 63 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 75% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 2.14 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 210% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 330 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.