Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 21% more |
| Protein | 21.22 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 382% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 6.06 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 216% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 54 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 671% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg ★ | 17 mg | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 41% more |
| Iron | 1.54 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 3% more |
| Potassium | 326 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 90% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.