Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised vs Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised
3 wins
🏆
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 252 kcal | 246 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised has 2% more |
| Protein | 29.92 g ★ | 24.04 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised has 24% more |
| Fat | 14.74 g ★ | 15.94 g | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 8% more |
| Sodium | 37 mg ★ | 83 mg | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 55% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 26 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 73% more |
| Iron | 2.52 mg | 2.59 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 3% more |
| Potassium | 183 mg | 335 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 45% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.