Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 560 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 239% more |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 75% more |
| Carbs | 3.39 g ★ | 0 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 0% more |
| Fat | 57.22 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 1503% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 66% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg ★ | 15 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 7% more |
| Iron | 1.18 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 13% more |
| Potassium | 125 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 51% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.