Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 560 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 266% more |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 68% more |
| Carbs | 3.39 g ★ | 0 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 0% more |
| Fat | 57.22 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 984% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 72% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 100% more |
| Iron | 1.18 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 162% more |
| Potassium | 125 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 72% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.