Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Bananas, raw
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Bananas, raw
7 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Bananas, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 731 kcal | 89 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 721% more |
| Protein | 6.5 g ★ | 1.09 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 496% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 22.84 g ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Fat | 78.3 g | 0.33 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 23627% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.6 g ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 12.23 g | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg | 1 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 2400% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 5 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 240% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg ★ | 0.26 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 81% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 8.7 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Potassium | 129 mg | 358 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.