Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
6 wins
🏆
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 731 kcal | 130 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 462% more |
| Protein | 6.5 g ★ | 2.69 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 142% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 28.17 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 78.3 g | 0.28 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 27864% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.05 g | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg ★ | 382 mg | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 93% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 10 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 70% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg ★ | 0.2 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 135% more |
| Potassium | 129 mg ★ | 35 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 269% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.