Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
2 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 731 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 397% more |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 78% more |
| Fat | 78.3 g | 2.08 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 3664% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 75% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 9 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 89% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 0.71 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 34% more |
| Potassium | 129 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 48% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.