Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Bananas, raw
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Bananas, raw
7 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Bananas, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 685 kcal | 89 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 670% more |
| Protein | 8.5 g ★ | 1.09 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 680% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 22.84 g ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Fat | 72.38 g | 0.33 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 21833% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.6 g ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 12.23 g | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Sodium | 26 mg | 1 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 2500% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg ★ | 5 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 300% more |
| Iron | 0.38 mg ★ | 0.26 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 46% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 8.7 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 358 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.