Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
6 wins
🏆
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 685 kcal | 130 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 427% more |
| Protein | 8.5 g ★ | 2.69 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 216% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 28.17 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 72.38 g | 0.28 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 25750% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.05 g | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 26 mg ★ | 382 mg | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 93% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg ★ | 10 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 100% more |
| Iron | 0.38 mg ★ | 0.2 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 90% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg ★ | 35 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 166% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.