Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 685 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 366% more |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 72% more |
| Fat | 72.38 g | 2.08 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 3380% more |
| Sodium | 26 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 74% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg ★ | 9 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 122% more |
| Iron | 0.38 mg | 0.71 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 46% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.