BURGER KING, Onion Rings vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, Onion Rings
5 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
6 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, Onion Rings | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 417 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 173% more |
| Protein | 3.86 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 84% more |
| Carbs | 43.58 g ★ | 0 g | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 0% more |
| Fat | 25.23 g | 5.28 g ★ | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 378% more |
| Fiber | 2.7 g ★ | 0 g | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 0% more |
| Sugar | 5.43 g | 0 g ★ | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 0% more |
| Sodium | 776 mg | 90 mg ★ | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 762% more |
| Calcium | 115 mg ★ | 8 mg | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 1338% more |
| Iron | 0.78 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 73% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 0% more |
| Potassium | 167 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 62% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.