Chicory, witloof, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Chicory, witloof, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Chicory, witloof, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 17 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Carbs | 4 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Fat | 0.1 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 6% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Iron | 0.24 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Potassium | 211 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.