Chiton, leathery, gumboots (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Chiton, leathery, gumboots (Alaska Native)
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Chiton, leathery, gumboots (Alaska Native) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 8% more |
| Protein | 17.1 g ★ | 2.01 g | Chiton, leathery, gumboots (Alaska Native) has 751% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 0.15 g ★ | Chiton, leathery, gumboots (Alaska Native) has 967% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 121 mg ★ | 38 mg | Chiton, leathery, gumboots (Alaska Native) has 218% more |
| Iron | 16 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Chiton, leathery, gumboots (Alaska Native) has 2219% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.