Cockles, raw (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cockles, raw (Alaska Native)
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Cockles, raw (Alaska Native) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 79 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 12% more |
| Protein | 13.5 g ★ | 2.01 g | Cockles, raw (Alaska Native) has 572% more |
| Carbs | 4.7 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.15 g ★ | Cockles, raw (Alaska Native) has 367% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 30 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
| Iron | 16.2 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Cockles, raw (Alaska Native) has 2248% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.