Cornstarch vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cornstarch
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Cornstarch | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Cornstarch has 323% more |
| Protein | 0.26 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Carbs | 91.27 g ★ | 20.71 g | Cornstarch has 341% more |
| Fat | 0.05 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 9 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Calcium | 2 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 3 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.