CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 293 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried has 144% more |
| Protein | 18.06 g ★ | 4.4 g | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried has 310% more |
| Carbs | 20.29 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 5% more |
| Fat | 15.48 g | 1.92 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried has 706% more |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 75% more |
| Sugar | 0.09 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 90% more |
| Sodium | 874 mg | 7 mg ★ | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried has 12386% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Iron | 0.59 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 60% more |
| Potassium | 319 mg ★ | 172 mg | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried has 85% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.