CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 293 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried has 226% more |
| Protein | 18.06 g ★ | 2.01 g | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried has 799% more |
| Carbs | 20.29 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 2% more |
| Fat | 15.48 g | 0.15 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried has 10220% more |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Sugar | 0.09 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Sodium | 874 mg | 36 mg ★ | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter, fried has 2328% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 0.59 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 319 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.