CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
9 wins
| Nutrient | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 175 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw has 46% more |
| Protein | 0.89 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 80% more |
| Carbs | 13.01 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 39% more |
| Fat | 13.22 g | 1.92 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw has 589% more |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 43% more |
| Sugar | 11.07 g | 0.87 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw has 1172% more |
| Sodium | 110 mg | 7 mg ★ | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw has 1471% more |
| Calcium | 34 mg ★ | 17 mg | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw has 100% more |
| Iron | 0.29 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 81% more |
| Vitamin C | 14.2 mg ★ | 0 mg | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 162 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.