CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw
0 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
11 wins
| Nutrient | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 175 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw has 94% more |
| Protein | 0.89 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Carbs | 13.01 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
| Fat | 13.22 g | 0.15 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw has 8713% more |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Sugar | 11.07 g | 6.48 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw has 71% more |
| Sodium | 110 mg | 36 mg ★ | CRACKER BARREL, coleslaw has 206% more |
| Calcium | 34 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 11% more |
| Iron | 0.29 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Vitamin C | 14.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
| Potassium | 162 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.