CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 203 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak has 69% more |
| Protein | 31.52 g ★ | 4.4 g | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak has 616% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 8.52 g | 1.92 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak has 344% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 180 mg | 7 mg ★ | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak has 2471% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 59% more |
| Iron | 2.75 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak has 85% more |
| Potassium | 408 mg ★ | 172 mg | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak has 137% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.