CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 203 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak has 126% more |
| Protein | 31.52 g ★ | 2.01 g | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak has 1468% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 8.52 g | 0.15 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak has 5580% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 180 mg | 36 mg ★ | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak has 400% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 2.75 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | CRACKER BARREL, grilled sirloin steak has 299% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 408 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.