CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 327 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 173% more |
| Protein | 4.78 g ★ | 4.4 g | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 9% more |
| Carbs | 40.95 g ★ | 21.3 g | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 92% more |
| Fat | 16 g | 1.92 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 733% more |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 21% more |
| Sugar | 4.82 g | 0.87 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 454% more |
| Sodium | 463 mg | 7 mg ★ | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 6514% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg ★ | 17 mg | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 12% more |
| Iron | 0.73 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 51% more |
| Potassium | 141 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 18% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.