CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 327 kcal 90 kcal CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 263% more
Protein 4.78 g 2.01 g CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 138% more
Carbs 40.95 g 20.71 g CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 98% more
Fat 16 g 0.15 g CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 10567% more
Fiber 2.2 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more
Sugar 4.82 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more
Sodium 463 mg 36 mg CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 1186% more
Calcium 19 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more
Iron 0.73 mg 0.69 mg CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 6% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 141 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.