CRACKER BARREL, steak fries vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CRACKER BARREL, steak fries
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 255 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 113% more |
| Protein | 3.26 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 26% more |
| Carbs | 30.87 g ★ | 21.3 g | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 45% more |
| Fat | 13.18 g | 1.92 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 586% more |
| Fiber | 3.5 g ★ | 2.8 g | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 25% more |
| Sugar | 0.86 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 1% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg | 7 mg ★ | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 514% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg ★ | 17 mg | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 12% more |
| Iron | 0.69 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 54% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.9 mg ★ | 0 mg | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 0% more |
| Potassium | 551 mg ★ | 172 mg | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 220% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.