CRACKER BARREL, steak fries vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CRACKER BARREL, steak fries
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 255 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 183% more |
| Protein | 3.26 g ★ | 2.01 g | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 62% more |
| Carbs | 30.87 g ★ | 20.71 g | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 49% more |
| Fat | 13.18 g | 0.15 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 8687% more |
| Fiber | 3.5 g ★ | 3.3 g | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 6% more |
| Sugar | 0.86 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg | 36 mg ★ | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 19% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Iron | 0.69 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Equal |
| Vitamin C | 0.9 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Potassium | 551 mg ★ | 475 mg | CRACKER BARREL, steak fries has 16% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.