Fish, cod, Pacific, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, cod, Pacific, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, cod, Pacific, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 84 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 7% more |
| Protein | 20.42 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, cod, Pacific, cooked has 916% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.25 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, cod, Pacific, cooked has 67% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 134 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, cod, Pacific, cooked has 272% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Iron | 0.16 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 372 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 22% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.