Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), cooked, dry heat
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 28% more |
| Protein | 15.24 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), cooked, dry heat has 246% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.37 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), cooked, dry heat has 23% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 363 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), cooked, dry heat has 5086% more |
| Calcium | 25 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), cooked, dry heat has 47% more |
| Iron | 0.23 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 85% more |
| Potassium | 197 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), cooked, dry heat has 15% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.