Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 70 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 42% more |
| Protein | 12.41 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw has 182% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.93 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw has 1% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 296 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw has 4129% more |
| Calcium | 21 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw has 24% more |
| Iron | 0.18 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Potassium | 160 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 7% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.