Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 70 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 22% more |
| Protein | 12.41 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw has 517% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.93 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw has 1187% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 296 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, flatfish (flounder and sole species), raw has 722% more |
| Calcium | 21 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Iron | 0.18 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 160 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.